<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Hi, Dave<br>
    <br>
    I am not sure I understand your reference to 'cheapest computers'.
    As far as I can tell, the Raspberry Pi Zero is a scam. The
    pocketchip illustrates <br>
    the problem with the Raspberry Pi. Once you add the components
    needed to make a useful, deployable computer - the cost is greater
    than that of <br>
    an XO.<br>
    <br>
    I have yet to see a computer on the market that offers the
    capabilities of the XO for olpc deployments.<br>
    <br>
    On a separate note. I looked at the Vision proposal. It certainly
    deserves a close look. However, I tried to find out what are 'best
    practices' only to <br>
    be shown a perfect example of very bad practice. I followed a series
    of links only to find not one explained what a best practice is or
    who decides on <br>
    what is 'best'. I hope we can do a better job of documentation than
    that.<br>
    <br>
    Tony<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/30/2016 04:36 AM, Dave Crossland
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAEozd0w=iOtkVL4CbjBZMxy8jHWBYw+uAhU48pXx7i7HLmDDpw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Hi
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>I want to return to this older thread because of James
          Cameron's comment in <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/688#issuecomment-222393275">https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/688#issuecomment-222393275</a>
          :</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          40px;border:none;padding:0px">
          <div>
            <div>On the assumption that Sugar Labs is dropping support
              for XO-1, I'll close this pull request. Thanks for your
              time!</div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>But I understood from Tony and Adam in this thread that
            Sugar Labs _should_ keep support for the XO-1 as a goal.
            Adam said, </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          40px;border:none;padding:0px">
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>In Haiti XO-1s will be dominant across many schools
                for years and year to come.  Similar to Tony's
                description, but these typically will be using 32GB SD
                cards -- thankfully these are incredibly affordable. The
                resilience/repairability of the XO-1 laptops is the
                absolutely fascinating part. </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>I think this goal is wise because it ensures that Sugar
            runs well on the cheapest computers - like the $10 <a
              moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://getchip.com/pages/pocketchip">getchip.com/pages/pocketchip</a> and
            $5 <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/raspberry-pi-zero">https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/raspberry-pi-zero</a> -
            and ensures performance is only better on later XO models
            and 'regular' desktops/laptops.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>I edited <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Vision_proposal_2016">https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Vision_proposal_2016</a>
            to reflect this. <br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Cheers</div>
          <div>Dave</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
            <div class="gmail_quote">On 5 April 2016 at 17:04, James
              Cameron <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org" target="_blank">quozl@laptop.org</a>></span>
              wrote:<br>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On
                  Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:37:45AM -0400, Dave Crossland
                  wrote:<br>
                  ><br>
                  > Hi James<br>
                  ><br>
                </span>
                <div>
                  <div class="h5">> On 1 April 2016 at 15:06, James
                    Cameron <[1]<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org">quozl@laptop.org</a>>
                    wrote:<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     Let me spin you a tail.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     The myth of forward human development
                    doesn't apply to software.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     This is a parade of people, several walking
                    abreast, beside a slow<br>
                    >     moving flat bed truck, all holding on to a
                    ribbon.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     The truck is the world, and the internet as
                    it stands.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     The first person, next to the truck, are
                    our learners or users.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     The second person is Sugar Labs; with our
                    activities, and Sugar.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     The third person is distributions of Linux,
                    like Fedora and Ubuntu,<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     The fourth person are the hardware vendors,
                    like commodity suppliers<br>
                    >     or OLPC.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     The fifth person are the Linux kernel
                    developers.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     As the procession walks beside the truck,
                    the ribbon is not always<br>
                    >     straight.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     Some people walk faster than others.  Some
                    let go of the ribbon and<br>
                    >     others take their place.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     I'm glad you're here, you're bringing a new
                    perspective.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     But the ribbon is actually toilet paper, so
                    the pressure to keep up,<br>
                    >     while real, doesn't get felt, instead the
                    paper breaks.<br>
                    ><br>
                    >     Do not target a rapidly diminishing
                    enthusiastic group, or the future<br>
                    >     users will suffer.<br>
                    ><br>
                    > I'm sorry, I didn't fully understand you here
                    at the last line. You had said<br>
                    > earlier,<br>
                    ><br>
                    > >     for the future of Sugar Labs, they
                    should be concentrating on<br>
                    > >     later designs than one from 2007 that
                    is no longer available and<br>
                    > >     rapidly dying from old age.<br>
                    ><br>
                    > So you mean, it would be unwise for Sugar Lab's
                    vision/mission/strategy for the<br>
                    > next 3-5 years to focus on supporting the
                    rapidly diminishing (yet<br>
                    > enthusiastic) group of XO owners, and focus on
                    the future users who are not XO<br>
                    > owners?<br>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                </div>
                You might target this group of XO-1 owners and become a
                closed<br>
                community into which all communications are judged
                against suitability<br>
                for the majority (which would then be XO-1 owners).<br>
                <br>
                It would feel good!  [warning, sarcasm in this
                paragraph]<br>
                <br>
                I'm loath to battle the laws of physics, 'cause I know
                who wins.<br>
                <div class="">
                  <div class="h5"><br>
                    --<br>
                    James Cameron<br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://quozl.netrek.org/" rel="noreferrer"
                      target="_blank">http://quozl.netrek.org/</a><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <br>
            <br clear="all">
            <div><br>
            </div>
            -- <br>
            <div class="gmail_signature"
              data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Cheers<br>
              Dave</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>