<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 11/05/16 a las 13:01, Dave Crossland
escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAEozd0zLu7wtUDcjcfwS7ytKgiQpTUorqa2Cc--4LMPXehjFzw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"></blockquote>
</div>
So, the motion failed, with 3 votes for, 1 vote against, and 4
abstains, and the funds will accrue into the general fund.
</blockquote>
That is a curious conclusion. The Governance does not mention how
SLOBs votes are counted, but I would have assumed a simple majority
was needed, not absolute majority.<br>
<br>
So which is it? Do we have a precedent?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Sebastian<br>
</body>
</html>