<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div></div><div><br></div><div>On 5 Apr 2016, at 06:37, Dave Crossland <<a href="mailto:dave@lab6.com">dave@lab6.com</a>> wrote:<br>Hi James</div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 1 April 2016 at 15:06, James Cameron <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org" target="_blank">quozl@laptop.org</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> Do not target a rapidly diminishing enthusiastic group, or the future users will suffer.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>So you mean, it would be unwise for Sugar Lab's vision/mission/strategy for the next 3-5 years to focus on supporting the rapidly diminishing (yet enthusiastic) group of XO owners, and focus on the future users</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>That's consistent with what I read into James wrote.<div><br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>who are not XO owners?</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's not what I read. I think you added that. I read James as advocating to reduce what drag old XO-1s put on future work, and that seems really reasonable to me, notwithstanding my status as an XO-1 owner.</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>Cheers<br>Dave</div></div> </div></div> </div></blockquote><div><br></div>Martin</div></div></div></body></html>