<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Gustavo,<br>
<br>
It's been four years already that Adobe dropped support for Linux
[1]. Yes there are workarounds on "life support". Some distros, even
google, maintain some kind of solution. Maybe even OLPC can help
you. But really, I invite you to think this thru.<br>
<br>
I have seen many times XO deployers wanting to put a checkmark on
"flash support" and they often do it. In practice, have you tried
Flash on an XO? It's practically worthless. So you need to decide if
you want to provide the best user experience or rather put a
checkmark on "flash support".<br>
<br>
If you have specific contents you own you <i>could </i>try to
sugarize your swf with a wrapper that somebody made. I've seen this
work, but if I were you I think efforts rewriting in an open format
are better spent [because they can be reused].<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Sebastian<br>
<br>
[1]
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.tuxgarage.com/2012/02/adobe-drops-support-of-flash-for.html">http://www.tuxgarage.com/2012/02/adobe-drops-support-of-flash-for.html</a><br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/03/16 09:06, Gustavo Duarte
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACV5_BXivby2m++y7rmGVgwPPtd+6YHJJJcfYgkQEmCE8youMg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Hi,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Mmmm .... on Linux Firefox, Chrome and Epiphany has support
for flash, i tested and working well.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>And Ubuntu, has a package flashplugin-installer.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I guess, Browse activity, isn't detecting this plugin.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thoughts ?</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
I+D SomosAzucar.Org
"icarito" #somosazucar en Freenode IRC
"Nadie libera a nadie, nadie se libera solo. Los seres humanos se liberan en comunión" - P. Freire</pre>
</body>
</html>