On 4 Sep 2015 00:22, "Martin Abente" <<a href="mailto:martin.abente.lahaye@gmail.com">martin.abente.lahaye@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:43 PM, James Cameron <<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org">quozl@laptop.org</a>> wrote: >> >> The errors complain of missing symbols; >> >> - sugar_event_controller_get_state >> >> - acme_volume_alsa_new >> >> Which were both added after 0.98. >> >> On my F18 test systems, the package sugar-toolkit-0.98 brings in a >> _sugarext.so file in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sugar/ which >> does not have these symbols. >> >> If this file were being used instead, then the outcome may be as >> reported. >> >> Is the package present? > > > No, is not present. Also, that does not explain why the same 106 packages work perfectly fine on fc23 when are built for fc22, while they fail when built for fc23. > > As you mentioned in a previous reply, the only difference in build time I also noticed, looking at the logs, is the -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld' flag. which is passed to all gir-* (gobject introspection) calls. > Yes, it's a well advertised feature of F-23, but we're not the first distro to enable it and unless there's dodgy stuff going on in sugar it should cause no issues. Peter