<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:49 PM, James Cameron <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org" target="_blank">quozl@laptop.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:59:06AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> > On September 1, 2015 at 9:16 PM James Cameron <<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org">quozl@laptop.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:<br>
> > > That leads me to think if sugar is building against a library that<br>
> > > is only available in sugar's toolkit should the toolkit be declared<br>
> > > as a BuildRequires and be pulled into the BuildRoot for sugar?<br>
> ><br>
> > Possibly because nothing in the build of package "sugar" uses the<br>
> > library.<br>
> ><br>
> > I've looked through the Makefile.am files in "sugar" and none of them<br>
> > do linking, and the ones that execute Python code don't need that<br>
> > library.<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> Ok got it, ldconfig keeps it all straight, so it's contained to the<br>
> call in the toolkit, bringing the login manager back in a loop, so I<br>
> see when booting the F23 iso in a vm.<br>
<br>
</span>Couldn't parse that, sorry.</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span class=""><br>
> The only change I see from F22 with 104 to F23 with 106 around<br>
> SugarExt is the commit to "Add capture device support" in the<br>
> toolkit.<br>
<br>
</span>That's strange, in my git repo that commit is just before the 0.101.4<br>
release back in <a href="tel:2014-03-22" value="+59820140322">2014-03-22</a>.</blockquote><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
It was the most recent change to SugarExt, but it should have been in<br>
F22 with 0.104 already.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div>Yes, all changes that impact on SugarExt were already present in 0.104, being this [1] the last one.</div></div><div><br></div><div><div>Refs:</div><div>[1] <a href="https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/commit/7739336fb62afc05040559187ef2d47c89c32506">https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/commit/7739336fb62afc05040559187ef2d47c89c32506</a></div></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
I've not got the bandwidth for downloading SoaS, but the tests I<br>
suggest are:<br>
<br>
a. use RPM to reinstall the Sugar 0.106 packages, </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
b. use RPM to reinstall the F22 Sugar 0.104 binary packages,</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
c. use RPM to rebuild the F22 Sugar 0.104 packages from src.rpm.</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
That would help to divide the problem between Sugar and Fedora 23., </blockquote><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="im">
--<br>
James Cameron<br>
<a href="http://quozl.linux.org.au/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://quozl.linux.org.au/</a><br>
</span><div class=""><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>