<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Did you know that there are more XO laptop users in my country Nigeria. All user have XO-1, I was the only user using xo-1.5 in the country before i gave it to my cousin to use after i got the xo-4 touch. So i am saying that since the OLPC program is no longer working in Nigeria but there are till users, some i help them in download the latest OS from the OLPC site. My reason for speaking out is because if the OS is been focus on xo-1.5, xo-1.75 and xo-4 it's will not just reduction of the users in Nigeria, it's will also kill the only hope of using a computer for kids that can afford a system. I am also creating a way the Government will support the program just like Rwanda.<br><br>Best<br><br>Samson Goddy <br><br><div>> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 11:15:53 -0400<br>> From: walter.bender@gmail.com<br>> To: tony_anderson@usa.net<br>> CC: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org<br>> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 78, Issue 15<br>> <br>> Well said Tony.<br>> <br>> -walter<br>> <br>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson@usa.net> wrote:<br>> > Hi, Sebastian<br>> ><br>> > This troll aside, I think we are doing the same thing with different<br>> > emphasis.<br>> ><br>> > I am looking at Rwanda which is still deploying laptops nationwide. They are<br>> > currently using XO-1.75, but continue to support a large number of XO-1 and<br>> > XO-1.5. I really don't detect any understanding that schools are different<br>> > than GE. GE will depreciate their computer purchases and replace obsolete<br>> > equipment. Schools get one chance and then must make do with what they have.<br>> > The only end-of-life for XO-1s is when they are scrapped or stop working or<br>> > end up as museum pieces in the original cartons in some principal's office.<br>> ><br>> > This troll's estimate of 300,000 is intended to be insulting because he has<br>> > no interest in an accurate answer. The claim of 3,000,000 is based on the<br>> > number shipped (and even then probably a round-up number). This is similar<br>> > to the regular announcements that x organization is making 100,000,000 books<br>> > available free to everyone or that a simple device will provide access to<br>> > the world's information throughout Africa or the internet will be available<br>> > to the world from balloons.<br>> ><br>> > You know as I do, from hands-on experience, that there are far more than<br>> > 300,000 laptops deployed. What we don't know is how many are being used<br>> > regularly and what impact they are having. You also know from hands-on<br>> > experience, that most of these laptops are XO-1s.<br>> ><br>> > Even 300,000 represents an investment in education 60 million dollars (plus<br>> > shipping and handling!), not a trivial amount. This investment has been made<br>> > to improve the educational opportunity of children without regular internet<br>> > access.<br>> ><br>> > My belief is that best course is to show what is possible with the XO and<br>> > open source software and open educational resources to facilitate learning<br>> > for those children.<br>> > Could we do better? Of course. Are we doing the best we can. Yes!<br>> ><br>> > If this troll wants to help, fine. Then he can ask the incisive question:<br>> > What can I do to help?<br>> ><br>> > Tony<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On 04/11/2015 04:37 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote:<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On 11/04/15 09:12, Tony Anderson wrote:<br>> ><br>> > I like incisive - to the point. He is not asking about the apparent<br>> > discrepancy between the potential number of laptops in use but is throwing<br>> > around words like deceit.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Looking at the statement in question, from our main website: "Sugar’s<br>> > Activities are used every school day by nearly 3 million children in more<br>> > than forty countries."<br>> ><br>> > I would not feel comfortable saying this out loud.<br>> > If there were 3 million XO laptops sold, I'd bet half of the ones still<br>> > running run GNOME.<br>> ><br>> > Like you say, we don't know.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > After all, what is 'use'. Does this mean the number of laptops running Sugar<br>> > at a specific instance of time, or at least one hour in a week, a month, a<br>> > year or a laptop that is capable of running Sugar if turned on? How many<br>> > Window 7 systems are in use?<br>> ><br>> > None of us know an answer to that question, but we know the number is large<br>> > enough to warrant our spending our time as volunteers to make that<br>> > experience as constructive and enjoyable as possible.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > This might have been a more constructive answer from you. Thank you.<br>> ><br>> > While it is important to support existing users, I am more concerned with<br>> > the next 1000 million people who's freedom to act with computers is at<br>> > stake.<br>> ><br>> > Sebastian<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > Sugar-devel mailing list<br>> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org<br>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel<br>> ><br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> -- <br>> Walter Bender<br>> Sugar Labs<br>> http://www.sugarlabs.org<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Sugar-devel mailing list<br>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org<br>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel<br></div> </div></body>
</html>