<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 8:54:19 am James Cameron <<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org">quozl@laptop.org</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:39:06PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > +sugar-devel > > On 01/06/2015 04:52 AM, Sam P. wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I was wondering about the possibility of putting the new ASLO bundles on > > the download.sl.o mirror. I was going to put them into a separate > > folder (named "activities2"), so there may be duplication from the old > > ASLO bundles, resulting in more space usage. This will hopefully be > > short term :) > > Go ahead, all our mirrors should be fine carrying a few hundred MBs of > data. However, I don't believe you for a moment when you say it's going > to be short term ;-) Activity bundles? One could also run hardlink(1) on the two trees, which would eliminate the duplication. </blockquote><div> I use a different file system structure to the old ASLO. It is very different, because the old ASLO uses it's own IDs whereas I use bundle IDs. </div></div>