I agree too but I'm not sure anyone on this thread was saying something different :) On Tuesday, 5 November 2013, Tony Anderson wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> +1 Well said! On 11/05/2013 04:03 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Having been involved in the OLPC OS side of things I believe you would be much better taking the work done by OLPC with things like olpc-os-builder and the work upstream with Fedora to use it to build out OS images that will work in a similar way across both XOs and other HW be it x86 netbook or cheap ARM devices rather than reinventing the wheel! We already have the basis of the educational experience from the current releases of Sugar. In terms of HW I think we should use upstream distros and let them care about the HW and work with one or two of them to ensure that the Sugar experience on them is great OOTB so that people can then focus on development of the platform. That's what I've been doing with Fedora and Sugar for 5 years! IMO the sugar OOTB there "just works" Peter </blockquote> _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list <a>Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a> </blockquote> -- Daniel Narvaez