<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 29/10/13 07:15, Walter Bender escribió: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:CADf7C8tY-YB28tqp60f-OLQfp2w8Bm1rRZwSxb714KqGMAymmQ@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">While I agree that "in the field" in Peru, a major Sugar deployment, means 0.94, there are many Sugar deployments using newer versions of Sugar (Uruguay, Nicaragua, Australia among others). regards. -walter </pre> </blockquote> In reality, one never knows what one will find in the field. In large deployments, like Perú, upgrading software versions may take an entire year, and may never reach all students. In Perú, the most likely Sugar you will find in the field is actually still an image based on 10.2 with Sugar 0.84, which is still the official image. Yes, that is Sugar *before pretty toolbars*, which first appeared in Sugar 0.86. It has been a success of the local Sugar community to get the Ministry to pilot and hopefully deploy an image based in Sugar 0.94 in 2014 which is argueably still the better performing / stable quality Sugar. Probably the best thing to do is to develop for current Sugar 0.98+ and if you want to reach a specific place, just be prepared to bring updated operating system images with you. This is a little tricky because of the DRM in XO laptops. Only signed images will install on "secured" laptops. Most of the time, to my knowledge, images signed by OLPC can be used, except in Uruguay where OLPC's signatures don't work and you are forced to used official government (Ceibal) operating system images. Regards, Sebastian </body> </html>