<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 29/10/13 07:15, Walter Bender
escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADf7C8tY-YB28tqp60f-OLQfp2w8Bm1rRZwSxb714KqGMAymmQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">While I agree that "in the field" in Peru, a major Sugar deployment,
means 0.94, there are many Sugar deployments using newer versions of
Sugar (Uruguay, Nicaragua, Australia among others).
regards.
-walter
</pre>
</blockquote>
In reality, one never knows what one will find in the field.<br>
In large deployments, like Perú, upgrading software versions may<br>
take an entire year, and may never reach all students.<br>
<br>
In Perú, the most likely Sugar you will find in the field is
actually still<br>
an image based on 10.2 with Sugar <b>0.84</b>, which is still the
official<br>
image. Yes, that is Sugar *before pretty toolbars*, which first<br>
appeared in Sugar 0.86.<br>
<br>
It has been a success of the local Sugar community to get the<br>
Ministry to pilot and hopefully deploy an image based in Sugar <b>0.94</b>
<br>
in 2014 which is argueably still the better performing / stable<br>
quality Sugar.<br>
<br>
Probably the best thing to do is to develop for current <b>Sugar 0.98</b>+<br>
and if you want to reach a specific place, just be prepared to bring<br>
updated operating system images with you. This is a little tricky
because<br>
of the DRM in XO laptops. Only signed images will install on
"secured"<br>
laptops. Most of the time, to my knowledge, images signed by OLPC<br>
can be used, except in Uruguay where OLPC's signatures don't work<br>
and you are forced to used official government (Ceibal) operating<br>
system images.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Sebastian<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>