<div>Weird. There is no tarball but the release has been tagged in git.</div><div> </div><div><a href="http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libxklavier/tag/?id=libxklavier-5.4">http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libxklavier/tag/?id=libxklavier-5.4</a> </div><div> </div><div>I wonder if they just forgot to upload the tarball...</div><div> </div>On Tuesday, 8 October 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'dwnarvaez@gmail.com')">dwnarvaez@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > By the way I think libxklavier 5.4 is not even in Fedora 19 but it's > required for the keyboard control panel section to work. I've just checked this but presumably by 5.4 you mean an unreleased version or SVC head because there is no 5.4 released as yet [1] Peter [1] <a href="http://download.gnome.org/sources/libxklavier/" target="_blank">http://download.gnome.org/sources/libxklavier/</a> > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> >> From memory gwebsockets 0.3, libxklavier 5.4, webkitgtk 2.0.x. There are >> almost certainly more deps. (We really need to start tracking our >> dependencies more systematically but it's tricky). >> >> On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Jerry Vonau wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:57 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >>> > It would be nice but I think it would involve a non trivial amount of >>> > work to do it properly. It's not just rebuilding the sugar rpms, there >>> > are system dependencies that would need to be built... latest >>> > libxklavier and webkitgtk comes to my mind, but there is probably >>> > more. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> What versions of the above packages and gwebsockets are required? >>> >>> Jerry >>> >>> > >>> > On 15 August 2013 05:12, Martin Abente >>> > <<a>martin.abente.lahaye@gmail.com</a>> wrote: >>> > +1 This would be great! >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >>> > <<a>gonzalo@laptop.org</a>> wrote: >>> > +1 to have rpms to install over 13.2.0 >>> > In this way we can isolate for other changes on the >>> > distro, >>> > for every change in Fedora version, there are broken >>> > pieces, >>> > we learned that... >>> > >>> > >>> > Gonzalo >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM, James Cameron >>> > <<a>quozl@laptop.org</a>> wrote: >>> > Yes, an image or a procedure for retrofit of >>> > 13.2.0 please. >>> > >>> > I think a retrofit might provide for wider >>> > testing. A set of RPMs to >>> > download and install, then reboot? >>> > >>> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:28:14PM +0200, >>> > Daniel Narvaez wrote: >>> > > Being an OLPC list perhaps it's better to >>> > wait we have a XO image before >>> > > posting there? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 14 August 2013 15:26, Chris Leonard >>> > <<a>cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com</a>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > </blockquote> -- Daniel Narvaez