<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/29/2013 06:01 AM, Thomas Gilliard
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:521F460D.5030307@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/29/2013 05:35 AM, Thomas
Gilliard wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:521F4016.4000704@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/28/2013 11:03 AM, Gonzalo
Odiard wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJ+iPVQk6e6Kg5Fi=B=TTK-C8ohKyttxZ1Gr_Go+hoqWfwzXtA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">I agree in the need of testing.
<div>Testing is more difficult this cycle because:</div>
<div>* We have less developers working.</div>
<div>* We don't have the images we usually used to test on
our main hardware platform (XO*) yet.</div>
<div>I don't know if any test is done now on Fedora 20 Sugar
spin,</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Soas F20 Alpha TC1 live x86_64 starts as a gnome desktop with
only e-toys and a utility group of apps. There is no sugar.<br>
yum install @sugar-desktop does not install sugar. This has
been the case for a while in nightly composes also.<br>
<br>
TC2 is just out and I am looking at it.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Same for f20 Alpha TC2:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Soas-Alpha-TC2-x86_64.png">http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Soas-Alpha-TC2-x86_64.png</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I just did "yum install lightdm" in {alt} {f2} root console of
installed F20_Alpha_TC-2-Soas and sugar starts after restart:<br>
<br>
(I remembered we used lightdm in f19 Soas)<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:F20_Alpha_TC-2-SoaS_with_lightdm_.png">http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:F20_Alpha_TC-2-SoaS_with_lightdm_.png</a><br>
<br>
Tom Gilliard<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:521F460D.5030307@gmail.com" type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:521F4016.4000704@gmail.com" type="cite"> <br>
Tom Gilliard<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJ+iPVQk6e6Kg5Fi=B=TTK-C8ohKyttxZ1Gr_Go+hoqWfwzXtA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>but according to Peter Robinson mail, not too much
communication from that part.</div>
<div>From my part, I am building rpms for Australia, to use
sugar 0.100 on a F18 image.</div>
<div>We will do testing on that, but not in the web part, at
least not now, due to missing dependencies.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Gonzalo</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:43 PM,
Daniel Narvaez <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:dwnarvaez@gmail.com" target="_blank">dwnarvaez@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="im">On 28 August 2013 19:33, Walter Bender
<span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:walter.bender@gmail.com"
target="_blank">walter.bender@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0
0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
To me the issue is that we have no sense of
the urgency of the 250<br>
bugs that have not been triaged. Most of the
bugs that have been<br>
triaged are not urgent and should not hold up
the release. (They can<br>
be tagged for 102 with little consequence.)
But the great unknown is<br>
what scares me.</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div>There are those and there are the N bugs
which has not been discovered because people are
not testing... We can block rescheduling on
completing the triage but can we block on
someone doing the testing? This is totally a
subjective feeling but my impression is that the
worst bugs are unreported.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>I was hoping to go towards continuous
development gradually after 0.100 but now I sort
of feel forced into it because there are too
many unknowns to put down a schedule.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel"
target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>