<div dir="ltr"><div>This is based on the last sugar-build configuration which supported fedora 18. Note, I'm guessing a lot, you should give it a try before settling on a plan.<br><br>* webkitgtk<br></div><div><br></div>
<div>which drags in<br></div><div><br>libsoup<br><div>glib</div><div>gobject-introspection</div><div>pygobject</div><div>dbus-python</div><div><br>* gwebsockets</div>* libxklavier (not needed on the XO according to Jerry).<br>
<br></div><div>The first group of dependencies are probably going to be quite a pain. So you might want to patch webactivity.py to support webkit1 instead.<br><br>That would leave only gwebsockets. Add sugar, sugar-toolkit-gtk3, sugar-datastore, sugar-artwork. A total of five packages, not too bad.<br>
</div><div><br><div><div><div>On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Martin Abente  wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>I think that having these packages on a publicly available repo would be of great help, not only for testing but also for developing... I know that maintaining specs and a building system sounds like headache now... but what if we can split the work?<br>


<br>Daniel, how many system packages (aprox) are we talking about?<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Jerry Vonau <span dir="ltr"><<a>jvonau@shaw.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>


<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">OLPC doesn't ship with cp-keyboard installed perhaps for testing on XOs<br>
we could just patch that out at rpm generation like OLPC had done in the<br>
past.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
Jerry<br>
</font></span><div><div><br>
On Sat, <a value="+59820130817">2013-08-17</a> at 02:17 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:<br>
> By the way I think libxklavier 5.4 is not even in Fedora 19 but it's<br>
> required for the keyboard control panel section to work.<br>
><br>
> On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:<br>
>         >From memory gwebsockets 0.3, libxklavier 5.4, webkitgtk<br>
>         2.0.x. There are almost certainly more deps. (We really need<br>
>         to start tracking our dependencies more systematically but<br>
>         it's tricky).<br>
><br>
>         On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Jerry Vonau wrote:<br>
>                 On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:57 +0200, Daniel Narvaez<br>
>                 wrote:<br>
>                 > It would be nice but I think it would involve a non<br>
>                 trivial amount of<br>
>                 > work to do it properly. It's not just rebuilding the<br>
>                 sugar rpms, there<br>
>                 > are system dependencies that would need to be<br>
>                 built... latest<br>
>                 > libxklavier and webkitgtk comes to my mind, but<br>
>                 there is probably<br>
>                 > more.<br>
>                 ><br>
>                 ><br>
><br>
>                 What versions of the above packages and gwebsockets<br>
>                 are required?<br>
><br>
>                 Jerry<br>
><br>
>                 ><br>
>                 > On 15 August 2013 05:12, Martin Abente<br>
>                 > <<a>martin.abente.lahaye@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>                 >         +1 This would be great!<br>
>                 ><br>
>                 ><br>
>                 ><br>
>                 >         On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Gonzalo<br>
>                 Odiard<br>
>                 >         <<a>gonzalo@laptop.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>                 >                 +1 to have rpms to install over<br>
>                 13.2.0<br>
>                 >                 In this way we can isolate for other<br>
>                 changes on the<br>
>                 >                 distro,<br>
>                 >                 for every change in Fedora version,<br>
>                 there are broken<br>
>                 >                 pieces,<br>
>                 >                 we learned that...<br>
>                 ><br>
>                 ><br>
>                 >                 Gonzalo<br>
>                 ><br>
>                 ><br>
>                 >                 On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM,<br>
>                 James Cameron<br>
>                 >                 <<a>quozl@laptop.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>                 >                         Yes, an image or a procedure<br>
>                 for retrofit of<br>
>                 >                         13.2.0 please.<br>
>                 ><br>
>                 >                         I think a retrofit might<br>
>                 provide for wider<br>
>                 >                         testing.  A set of RPMs to<br>
>                 >                         download and install, then<br>
>                 reboot?<br>
>                 ><br>
>                 >                         On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at<br>
>                 03:28:14PM +0200,<br>
>                 >                         Daniel Narvaez wrote:<br>
>                 >                         > Being an OLPC list perhaps<br>
>                 it's better to<br>
>                 >                         wait we have a XO image<br>
>                 before<br>
>                 >                         > posting there?<br>
>                 >                         ><br>
>                 >                         ><br>
>                 >                         > On 14 August 2013 15:26,<br>
>                 Chris Leonard<br>
>                 >                         <<a>cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com</a>><br>
>                 wrote:<br>
>                 >                         ><br>
>            </div></div><div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a>Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div></div></div>
</div></div>