<div dir="ltr"><div>I think that having these packages on a publicly available repo would be of great help, not only for testing but also for developing... I know that maintaining specs and a building system sounds like headache now... but what if we can split the work? Daniel, how many system packages (aprox) are we talking about? </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"> <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Jerry Vonau <<a href="mailto:jvonau@shaw.ca" target="_blank">jvonau@shaw.ca</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">OLPC doesn't ship with cp-keyboard installed perhaps for testing on XOs we could just patch that out at rpm generation like OLPC had done in the past. Jerry <div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"> On Sat, <a href="tel:2013-08-17" value="+59820130817">2013-08-17</a> at 02:17 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > By the way I think libxklavier 5.4 is not even in Fedora 19 but it's > required for the keyboard control panel section to work. > > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >From memory gwebsockets 0.3, libxklavier 5.4, webkitgtk > 2.0.x. There are almost certainly more deps. (We really need > to start tracking our dependencies more systematically but > it's tricky). > > On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Jerry Vonau wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:57 +0200, Daniel Narvaez > wrote: > > It would be nice but I think it would involve a non > trivial amount of > > work to do it properly. It's not just rebuilding the > sugar rpms, there > > are system dependencies that would need to be > built... latest > > libxklavier and webkitgtk comes to my mind, but > there is probably > > more. > > > > > > What versions of the above packages and gwebsockets > are required? > > Jerry > > > > > On 15 August 2013 05:12, Martin Abente > > <<a href="mailto:martin.abente.lahaye@gmail.com">martin.abente.lahaye@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > > +1 This would be great! > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Gonzalo > Odiard > > <<a href="mailto:gonzalo@laptop.org">gonzalo@laptop.org</a>> wrote: > > +1 to have rpms to install over > 13.2.0 > > In this way we can isolate for other > changes on the > > distro, > > for every change in Fedora version, > there are broken > > pieces, > > we learned that... > > > > > > Gonzalo > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM, > James Cameron > > <<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org">quozl@laptop.org</a>> wrote: > > Yes, an image or a procedure > for retrofit of > > 13.2.0 please. > > > > I think a retrofit might > provide for wider > > testing. A set of RPMs to > > download and install, then > reboot? > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at > 03:28:14PM +0200, > > Daniel Narvaez wrote: > > > Being an OLPC list perhaps > it's better to > > wait we have a XO image > before > > > posting there? > > > > > > > > > On 14 August 2013 15:26, > Chris Leonard > > <<a href="mailto:cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com">cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com</a>> > wrote: > > > > > > > <a href="http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing" target="_blank">http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing</a> > > > > > > Includes the Fabulous > New Zealand > > testing crew! > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 > at 9:16 AM, Daniel > > Narvaez > <<a href="mailto:dwnarvaez@gmail.com">dwnarvaez@gmail.com</a>> > > > wrote: > > > > Where is the testing > list? > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > </div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a> </div></div></blockquote></div> </div>