<div dir="ltr">On 27 June 2013 02:20, Gonzalo Odiard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gonzalo@laptop.org" target="_blank">gonzalo@laptop.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">At times, you need see the logs _and_ the sugar interface at the same time, <div>to be able to check when something is done.</div><div>That is the main reason I have found to need use sugar in a window,</div>
<div>and is important enough to me.</div><div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks. This is the kind of feedback I was looking for.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div>Why is important remove a feature working in our main platforms?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Because I might be forced to add another way to run sugar (full X sessions from inside another X session) but I don't want to increase the sugar-runner maintenance cost. Also, I'm not really keen about features that works on some distros and randomly crash on others. <br>
</div></div></div></div>