<html> <head> <style></style></head> <body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>And use VNC instead Xephyr?<div><br></div><div><a href="http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/1659/0001-sugar-emulator-use-vnc-instead-of-Xephyr-1659.patch" target="_blank">http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/1659/0001-sugar-emulator-use-vnc-instead-of-Xephyr-1659.patch</a></div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div><hr id="stopSpelling">Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:29:57 +0200<br>From: dwnarvaez@gmail.com<br>To: alanjas@hotmail.com<br>CC: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; suraj.gillespie@gmail.com; nachoel01@gmail.com<br>Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar build break<br><br><div dir="ltr"><div>The situation with Xephyr in generally is pretty sad. It's buggy and pretty much unmaintained. It's supposed to be replaced by xf86-video-nested, which was published a couple of years ago but doesn't seem to have made it to any distribution yet (and doesn't seem to be actively developed either).<br> <br></div>We could probably change sugar-runner to always use a full X server, that would be more reliable, but there are people that prefer to develop with sugar in a window rather than fullscreen...<br></div> <br>_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</div></div> </div></body> </html>