<div dir="ltr">Reworked the proposal to keep the method for background compatibility.<div><br></div><div style>Gonzalo</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Gonzalo Odiard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gonzalo@laptop.org" target="_blank">gonzalo@laptop.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Good point, etoys use the object chooser.<div>I don't know id dbus signature can do a parameter optative,</div>
<div>or how do it backwards conpatible</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Gonzalo</div>
</font></span></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Daniel Narvaez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dwnarvaez@gmail.com" target="_blank">dwnarvaez@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">What about non-python activities?<div><div><span></span><br><br>On Thursday, 20 June 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">
In this case, the activities don't use the dbus API, but the object defined in sugar-toolkit-gtk3.<div><br></div><div>Gonzalo</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Daniel Narvaez <span dir="ltr"><<a>dwnarvaez@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hello,<br><br></div>when reviewing patches I'm always unsure what to do about AP breaks, both in python and in dbus interfaces. Do we have any kind of policy we should follow?<br>
</div><br>
</div>The last case I run into is adding a parameter to the ObjectChooser dbus API. Is that a break we should make? Should we add a new method instead?<span><font color="#888888"><br clear="all"><div><div>
<div><div><br>-- <br>Daniel Narvaez<br>
</div></div></div></div></font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a>Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote><br><br></div></div><span><font color="#888888">-- <br>Daniel Narvaez<br><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>