On Thursday, 6 June 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 06/06/2013 11:34 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On Thursday, 6 June 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On 06/06/2013 01:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Hello, I setup a fork of webL10n. I amdified it and replaced API with the gaia one minus the b2g specific stuff. <a href="https://github.com/sugarlabs/**webL10n" target="_blank">https://github.com/sugarlabs/**webL10n</a><<a href="https://github.com/sugarlabs/webL10n" target="_blank">https://github.com/sugarlabs/webL10n</a>> </blockquote> I do not see any changes from you there, why do we need the for again? </blockquote> They are on the sugar-web branch. You mean why we need the changes? Couple of reasons, to make it work well with requirejs and to get a better public API (the same gaia is using). This code is sort of thought to be forked, mozilla are forking it themself despite being the upstream in practice. </blockquote> Oh, ok - did not see the branch. Thanks, gets clearer now. /me has not seen as many forks and copy-pastes as in the last weeks</blockquote><div> </div><div>Welcome to the magic world of JavaScript!!</div><div> </div><div> </div> -- Daniel Narvaez