<div dir="ltr">Walter, you have the *.zip in your mail :P (Remember?)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/3/28 Walter Bender <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:walter.bender@gmail.com" target="_blank">walter.bender@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez <<a href="mailto:nachoel01@gmail.com">nachoel01@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I have my feature :)<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change" target="_blank">http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change</a><br>
><br>
> PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember?<br>
<br>
</div>OK. Can you point me to the code in git?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-walter<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">><br>
><br>
> 2013/3/28 Martin Abente <<a href="mailto:martin.abente.lahaye@gmail.com">martin.abente.lahaye@gmail.com</a>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez <<a href="mailto:dwnarvaez@gmail.com">dwnarvaez@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> Hello,<br>
>>><br>
>>> we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in<br>
>>> the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here.<br>
>>><br>
>>> IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the<br>
>>> discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the<br>
>>> scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to<br>
>>> propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later.<br>
>>><br>
>>> * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the<br>
>>> release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad<br>
>>> idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this<br>
>>> involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be<br>
>>> developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but<br>
>>> there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve<br>
>>> research.<br>
>>><br>
>>> * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from<br>
>>> previous cycles.<br>
>>><br>
>>> <a href="http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection" target="_blank">http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should<br>
>>> probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending<br>
>>> out soon.<br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has<br>
>> passed through several iterations of design and code review already. This a<br>
>> great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in the<br>
>> ground.<br>
>><br>
>> It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM 2011,<br>
>> so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it.<br>
>><br>
>>> <a href="http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support" target="_blank">http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> It seems to be ready to go in.<br>
>>><br>
>>> * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through<br>
>>> several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?)<br>
>>><br>
>>> - homeview background image<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than<br>
>> happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more<br>
>> enjoyable to it's users.<br>
>><br>
>>><br>
>>> - multi-homeview<br>
>>><br>
>>> - webservices<br>
>>> - comment field in journal detail view<br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities<br>
>> for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another way to<br>
>> expand its capabilities without "writing-from-scratch" everything.<br>
>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5<br>
>>> activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What<br>
>>> does everyone think about that?<br>
>>><br>
>>> --<br>
>>> Daniel Narvaez<br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">--<br>
Walter Bender<br>
Sugar Labs<br>
<a href="http://www.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">http://www.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>