On 27 Mar 2013 17:58, "Daniel Narvaez" <<a href="mailto:dwnarvaez@gmail.com">dwnarvaez@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > > On 27 March 2013 18:47, Simon Schampijer <<a href="mailto:simon@schampijer.de">simon@schampijer.de</a>> wrote: > >> * I have not allocated dates for unstable tarballs. Is it actually > >> worth spending time building those? Is anyone using them? > > > > > > So far, Fedora has been picking them up and they made their way into the > > OLPC images that way. It is not much overhead to do, I would stick to it. > > Is Fedora still going to pick these up? (Since soas is going to stick > with 0.98 for F19). This 0.100 release is aimed for Sept timeframe and Fedora 20 will release around Halloween. The tree is already open for f20 so I'll land them as soon as they're cut for those that want true bleeding edge. Peter _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> > <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a>