Thanks Paul, Jerry, Peter. All three of your answers provided me the maximum cumulative information possible. Thanks a ton !! :) <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson <<a href="mailto:pbrobinson@gmail.com" target="_blank">pbrobinson@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Jerry Vonau <<a href="mailto:jvonau@shaw.ca">jvonau@shaw.ca</a>> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 03:37 +0530, Ajay Garg wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Where can I find the corresponding source-rpm packages, for :: >> >> * >> <a href="http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/bitfrost-1.0.18-1.fc18.armv7hl.rpm" target="_blank">http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/bitfrost-1.0.18-1.fc18.armv7hl.rpm</a> >> AND >> * >> <a href="http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/bitfrost-sugar-1.0.18-1.fc18.armv7hl.rpm" target="_blank">http://rpmdropbox.laptop.org/f18/bitfrost-sugar-1.0.18-1.fc18.armv7hl.rpm</a> >> >> > > These are in Fedora proper for i686 but looks like not in fedora's ARM > repo. > > <a href="http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/updates/testing/18/SRPMS/bitfrost-1.0.18-1.fc18.src.rpm" target="_blank">http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/updates/testing/18/SRPMS/bitfrost-1.0.18-1.fc18.src.rpm</a> </div>They are the same, there's no separation between ARM and i686 when it comes to the Fedora src.rpm Peter </blockquote></div> Regards, Ajay Garg Dextrose Developer Activity Central: <a href="http://activitycentral.com/" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" target="_blank">http://activitycentral.com</a>