Hi all.<br><br>(Sorry if I am asking a very stupid question)<br><br>Is there a link of an image (in ".img" + ".crc" format, for XO-1), that is based on F17, and contains sugar with NM 0.9?<br>I tried at <a href="http://download.sugarlabs.org/images/">http://download.sugarlabs.org/images/</a>, but apparently could not find anything useful.<br>
<br>Alternatively, a OS builder for the same end-results would also be good.<br><br>Thanks and Regards,<br>Ajay<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Ajay Garg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ajaygargnsit@gmail.com" target="_blank">ajaygargnsit@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Jon Nettleton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jon.nettleton@gmail.com" target="_blank">jon.nettleton@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Ajay Garg <<a href="mailto:ajaygargnsit@gmail.com" target="_blank">ajaygargnsit@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:23 AM, James Cameron <<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org" target="_blank">quozl@laptop.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:29:37PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > ajay wrote:<br>
>> > > Hi Paul.<br>
>> > ><br>
>> > > Well, I am doing development on sugar-jhbuild F17.<br>
>> > ><br>
>> > > So, after I launch sugar-emulator, I wish to have the sugar<br>
>> > > network-authentication popup pop up (if at all), and not the gnome<br>
>> > one.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > ah. sugar vs. gnome. now that i understand your problem, i find i<br>
>> > can be of no help whatsoever. sorry!<br>
>><br>
>> Indeed, I have no idea either. Running GNOME at the same time as<br>
>> Sugar means NetworkManager might behave differently, as it has<br>
>> multiple clients. So I never wanted to try that. Because it would<br>
>> not be representative of the typical usage.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Exactly !!!!<br>
<br>
</div>This functionality was just introduced in F17, NetworkManager 0.9.x.<br>
Previously you could only have one client connected to the<br>
NetworkManager daemon at a time. Now the behavior has changed<br>
to make it work better with fast-user-switching.<br>
<br>
This new connection sharing also causes secrets to be handled<br>
differently. Previously everything was stored in your gnome-keyring,<br>
now by default secrets are stored at the system level. A client<br>
can register to be a secrets provider however I don't know if this has<br>
been implemented in sugar yet.<br>
<div><br>
<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> When I was last testing Sugar and NetworkManager interaction, I did it<br>
>> on a system, such as an XO, without GNOME running. I edited the<br>
>> source files live and restarted Sugar to see the changes. When I had<br>
>> finished, I copied my changes out of the target and into git using ssh.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Well, that would indeed work. Thanks for the idea .. :D :D<br>
<br>
</div>I may have more information about this this weekend. I currently<br>
have an unstable network connection and the NetworkManager<br>
password popups are annoying me. If I find anything interesting<br>
I will update everyone.<br></blockquote><div> </div></div></div><div><br>Waiting for anything interesting, whole heartedly !! :)<br><br><br>Regards,<br>Ajay<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
-Jon<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br>