just in case, did you try this combination: libertas(without the patch) + disable_mesh.sh(removed) + resume-from-suspend (?) IF NM still crashes then we have been looking in the wrong direction, if not then we need to look deeper into the patch probably (@silbe ;)). <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ajay Garg <<a href="mailto:ajaygargnsit@gmail.com" target="_blank">ajaygargnsit@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div class="im">On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Martin Abente <<a href="mailto:martin.abente.lahaye@gmail.com">martin.abente.lahaye@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > Did you remove the disable mesh.script for the testing? </div>Yes. Both from :: a) my custom added in '/etc/init.d/NetworkManager'. b) '/etc/powed/postresume.d/disable_mesh.sh' Regards, Ajay <div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> > El may 4, 2012 10:39 p.m., "Ajay Garg" <<a href="mailto:ajaygargnsit@gmail.com">ajaygargnsit@gmail.com</a>> escribió: >> >> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Sascha Silbe <<a href="mailto:silbe@activitycentral.com">silbe@activitycentral.com</a>> >> wrote: >> > Ajay Garg <<a href="mailto:ajaygargnsit@gmail.com">ajaygargnsit@gmail.com</a>> writes: >> > >> > [...] >> >> b) >> >> Ensured that '/etc/modprobe.d/libertas.conf' contained only the >> >> following line :: >> >> >> >> options libertas libertas_disablemesh=0 >> > [...] >> >> f) >> >> Upon resume-from-suspend, NO ICONS COULD BE SEEN IN NEIGHBORHOOD VIEW. >> > >> > Interesting. >> > >> >> g) >> >> Observations e) and f) were observed, _every single time_. >> > >> > OK, I suppose you repeated this often enough and using exactly the same >> > environment and procedures as the other test cases? I.e. you are sure >> > that it's really specific to libertas_disablemesh=0 rather than just >> > occurring at random even without the libertas_disablemesh setting or >> > based on how the suspend / resume was triggered (e.g. idle suspend >> > vs. lid or power switch)? >> >> I tried 3 times, and it happened every time. (I tried with the "lid" >> approach every time, under identical conditions and set of >> procedures.). >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > I don't see anything in the patch or the module params code that would >> > explain this behaviour. If it's reproducible, I'll have to dive into it >> > and debug a bit... >> >> It is reproducible every time (at least at my end). :) >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Thanks for testing, BTW! >> >> My pleasure :) >> >> >> >> >> > >> > Sascha >> > >> > -- >> > <a href="http://sascha.silbe.org/" target="_blank">http://sascha.silbe.org/</a> >> > <a href="http://www.infra-silbe.de/" target="_blank">http://www.infra-silbe.de/</a> >> >> >> Regards, >> Ajay >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> >> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a> </div></div></blockquote></div>