But the table "says" that Terminal should work for all Sugar versions ? (yes*yes&31)<div>The log activity does not work either, but that seems normal according to the table (no yes & 23) <div class="gmail_quote"> Le 11 mars 2012 16:36, Thomas C Gilliard <<a href="mailto:satellit@bendbroadband.com">satellit@bendbroadband.com</a>> a écrit : <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On 03/11/2012 07:55 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 02:49:45PM +0100, laurent bernabe wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Ok, so I installed gnome-packagekit, then Sugar SDK 0.84 But I have two troubleshoots : - I have no way to log off the sugar emulator (version 0.84) </blockquote> Thats because sugar-0.84 was relying on Hal for such work. Hal was removed from recent distros. Since sdk/sugar:emulator is a Xephyr window, just close it. <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> - The terminal activity seems to take a lot of time to start (I cancelled it) </blockquote> Recent Terminal doesn' work with sugar versions less than 0.86. </blockquote> Activity tests for older sugar versions: <a href="http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/Activity_Matrix" target="_blank">http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/Activity_Matrix</a> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Regards Le 11 mars 2012 13:05, Aleksey Lim<<a href="mailto:alsroot@sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">alsroot@sugarlabs.org</a>> a écrit : <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:55:41PM +0100, laurent bernabe wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Ok, I did not install Package Kit, because I had done it once before, and the result was that I got two packages managers in my system instead of only one. Is there a way to install missing dependencies without package kit ? </blockquote> PackageKit is working on top of native packager. So, you have only one package manager all time. The whole reason for PackageKit project is having the same way to install packages on all distros (thats why it is being used in 0install/sweets). You should not have any problems after installing PackageKit on Ubuntu, just don't use it and continue using native tools. -- Aleksey </blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> </blockquote></div> </div>