The issue of using a dedicated software product to track test cases & results has come up from time to time. The situation as I understand it is that OLPC in general prefers to use the resources of other {often upstream} partners whenever possible. It is felt by some people that we would spend more time maintaining our own system in this case than we would save by having it. So I am waiting for Fedora to implement Nitrate & hopefully support us as a product-of-sorts, presuming that does eventually happen. I'm also half-waiting to see what they come up with for automated testing so that Sugar UI work goes a similar route, even though implementing something now could potentially save me hours of testing time. There also is a desire with both OLPC and Fedora to support anonymous users with their testing systems, and not all test case management software out there supports that. <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Kurt H Maier <<a href="mailto:karmaflux@gmail.com" target="_blank">karmaflux@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Would it be appropriate to investigate something like FitNesse[1] or testmaster[2] for Sugar and/or OLPC? Software like this might be overkill, but on the other hand, it would be nice to have a single point to collect testing standards & results, and be able to store testing history in a queryable format. Testmaster in particular is pretty easy to use and doesn't require much in the way of hosting; it's just CGI. [1] <a href="http://fitnesse.org/FitNesse.UserGuide.OneMinuteDescription" target="_blank">http://fitnesse.org/FitNesse.UserGuide.OneMinuteDescription</a> [2] <a href="http://testmaster.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank">http://testmaster.sourceforge.net/</a> -- # Kurt H Maier </blockquote></div>