<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>On 15 Dec 2011, at 17:44, Gonzalo Odiard <<a href="mailto:gonzalo@laptop.org">gonzalo@laptop.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>But I don't think is a good idea add a activity without a maintainer.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1</div><div><br></div><div>Activities without maintainers seem like a spiral to the bottom of the quality bucket <span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">- I'd personally not want to recommend the ASLO site to a teacher if we were knowingly promoting and uploading unmaintained activities. As an Open Source license (required by ASLO) allows anyone to potentially <span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">pick up maintenance, perhaps ASLO could be tweaked to hide all activities without a confirmed, named, maintainer by default?</span></span></div><div><br></div><div>--Gary</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><br>Gonzalo<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Sebastian Silva <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sebastian@somosazucar.org">sebastian@somosazucar.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Actually if the license permits it, there isnt a necessity to await
    confirmation by original author, although it would be nice to ask,
    IMHO<br>
    <br>
    El 14/12/11 19:46, Rafael Ortiz escribió:
    <blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5"><br>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Alan
        Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alanjas@hotmail.com" target="_blank">alanjas@hotmail.com</a>></span>
        wrote:<br>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
          <div>
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <blockquote style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:10pt;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
                      <div>
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div>
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div>
                                It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they
                                have OSI compliant Licences, pointing to
                                original devs, also if they provide a
                                good sugar experience. More info here:</div>
                              <div><br>
                              </div>
                              <div><a href="http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy#Guidelines_for_accepting_an_activity" target="_blank">http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy#Guidelines_for_accepting_an_activity</a></div>

                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                    <div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:10pt"><br>
                    </div>
                    <div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:10pt"><br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:10pt">Ok. The
                    "importants" are in ASLO.. maybe there are some that
                    not..</div>
                  <div style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:10pt"><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><font face="Tahoma">I could test some and upload
                      them. But corresponds me to do that? I do not want
                      to override the original developers ..</font></div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div>it's necessary to ask first the original devs.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div> </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <br>
      </div></div><div class="im"><pre>_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a>
</pre>
    </div></blockquote>
    <br>
  </div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Sugar-devel mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>