Hi James,<br><br>I finally got around that lib32 problem and produced a new package (same location: <a href="https://github.com/downloads/cgueret/SemanticXO/performances.tar.gz">https://github.com/downloads/cgueret/SemanticXO/performances.tar.gz</a> )<br>
The results you sent me last where weird, indicating no usage at all of disc space and constant read/write time. That's too good to be true :-)<br>Could you please try again with this new version? It would be best this time to run it from a terminal with Sugar switched off.<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Christophe<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 8 November 2011 08:29, James Cameron <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:quozl@laptop.org">quozl@laptop.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Aye, leaving Sugar running is a memory sucker.  Let me know if you need<br>
further testing.<br>
<div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
--<br>
James Cameron<br>
<a href="http://quozl.linux.org.au/" target="_blank">http://quozl.linux.org.au/</a><br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>