On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Daniel Drake <<a href="mailto:dsd@laptop.org">dsd@laptop.org</a>> wrote: <div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> <div class="im">On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Aleksey Lim <<a href="mailto:alsroot@activitycentral.org">alsroot@activitycentral.org</a>> wrote: > {...} </div>{...} In the end it is only a number, and there isn't anything wrong with sticking with the current scheme, even if the discussion did go in the "1.0" direction last time - see <a href="http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.laptop.olpc.sugar/25094/focus=25156" target="_blank">http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.laptop.olpc.sugar/25094/focus=25156</a> - but how would the existing scheme work? What release comes after 0.98? 0.100? Then 0.102? Daniel </blockquote></div> 0.982, 0.984 would provide 10 more even steps on the decimal number line (and signal the imminence of 1.0), 0.9802, 0.9804, would provide 100 steps, if we really still weren't satisfied. --Fred