<br>Hi Art.<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Art Hunkins <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:abhunkin@uncg.edu" target="_blank">abhunkin@uncg.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> @ Rafael expecially:<br> <br> With respect to various versions of Sugar and Record, I currently supply the following information in my readme.txt files for my FileMix and FileMixAuto activities (these activities suggest using Record to create audio files for use with FileMix):<br> <br> The natural vehicle for soundfile creation is the Record activity.<br> This activity is fairly simple and straightforward; the only problem<br> is that many versions of it do not work with various incarnations of<br> Sugar. The following pairings of Record with Sugar seem to work<br> reliably: v64 with Sugar-on-a-Stick Strawberry (0.84 - works rather<br> poorly); and v86 with XO-1.5, and XO-1 upgraded to Sugar 0.84. Sugar<br> 0.86 (Blueberry) and above (as of 5/2011) are compatible with Record<br> v90/91, including XO's upgraded to at least Sugar 0.90 (Mango lassi -<br> Fedora 14).<br> <br> ------<br> <br> The above pairings are the *only* ones that are compatible and produce Ogg Vorbis (not Speex) files.<br> <br> The problem is largely with SoaS Strawberry. Record v86, 90 or 91 are inoperative there. (FWIW, neither Record 90 nor 91 seem to work with the 2 June current nightly Fedora SoaS build either.)<br> <br> This SoaS/audio Record compatibility issue is certainly a complicated one. For the moment, I rest my case, and only hope that eventually SoaS Strawberry will have a new Record that works well with it.<br> <br></blockquote><div>Thanks for the precise information, this is also a problem of back portability, as SOAS is a shorthanded project, I think that is preferred to test activities on latest versions, I'm closing some of these bugs as obsolete for that reason, but with an open window (re-open state) if there are people that can work on fix them. </div> <div> </div><div><br></div><div> Cheers and thanks. </div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Art Hunkins<br> <br> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sugar Labs Bugs" <<a href="mailto:bugtracker-noreply@sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">bugtracker-noreply@sugarlabs.org</a>><br> Cc: <<a href="mailto:bugs@lists.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">bugs@lists.sugarlabs.org</a>><br> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 12:33 PM<br> Subject: Re: #2399 UNSP: Record 79 (and 86) issues - Sugar 0.84-0.88<div><div></div><div><br> <br> <br> #2399: Record 79 (and 86) issues - Sugar 0.84-0.88<br> ------------------------------------------+---------------------------------<br> Reporter: abhunkin | Owner: dsd<br> Type: defect | Status: closed<br> Priority: Unspecified by Maintainer | Milestone: Unspecified by Release Team<br> Component: Record | Version: 0.84.x<br> Severity: Major | Resolution: obsolete<br> Keywords: | Distribution: Fedora<br> Status_field: Unconfirmed |<br> ------------------------------------------+---------------------------------<br> Changes (by RafaelOrtiz):<br> <br> * status: new => closed<br> * resolution: => obsolete<br> <br> <br> Comment:<br> <br> I suggest re-testing with new versions (v91) of Record.<br> <br> -- <br> Ticket URL: <<a href="http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2399#comment:4" target="_blank">http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2399#comment:4</a>><br> Sugar Labs <<a href="http://sugarlabs.org/" target="_blank">http://sugarlabs.org/</a>><br> Sugar Labs bug tracking system <br> _______________________________________________<br></div></div> Sugar-devel mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br> </blockquote></div><br> </div>