<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" /> <title></title> </head> <body> Hi Guys,   Thank you all for the input in this instance. James no problem, sometimes the conversation gets a bit lost in message threads, sorry :)    So I really have two options which I will consider. 1) Ask for advice from the oversight committee on this type of restricted license in this instance, and possible for future health related activities. 2) Create a locked/password protected section of the activity that allows controlled modification of the health message images and text and publish under normal free access CC.    I genuinely have no objection to user modification in theory, however the activity was primarily developed to portray scientifically accepted peer-reviewed guidance, and I hope the message remains intact.   I appreciate everyone's thought on this,  WCP    <div style="margin: 5px 0px 5px 0px; font-family: monospace;"> On 25 June 2010 at 05:40 James Cameron <quozl@laptop.org> wrote: > G'day World Class Project Dev Team, > > Sorry, my comment "important that the health message be controlled" was > directed at Gonzalo, not you.  I wanted to mention it as a reason why > the license was unusual compared to other Sugar activities. > > I have no criticism of the content, as I'm entirely unqualified. > > I think you (World Class Project Dev Team) should continue to restrict > the content, for the reasons you outlined. > > I don't know the policy for hosting an activity this license on Sugar > Labs, and I hope someone who does know will speak up or make a decision. > ;-) > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ </div> </body> </html>