<div class="gmail_quote">On 2 February 2010 22:45, Simon Schampijer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:simon@schampijer.de">simon@schampijer.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> In the design meeting and the ml-thread the '+' layout and the rows of</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> XOs were favored. Eben brought as well the 'static rows with separated<br> fill/stroke' on the table. Let's try to find an agreement.<br> <br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The proposal looks great. May I suggest a revision to the string literals?</div><div><br></div><div>Click to change stroke color: => Outline</div><div>Click to change fill color: => Body</div> <div><br></div><div>Stroke/Fill are terms of art in vector drawing area. My guess is that the terms outline and body (when looking at the XO figure) may be more natural.</div><div><br></div><div>I feel we can omit "Click to change" or replace it with "Choose". I'm pretty sure it'll be obvious by exploration that clicking on the little XOs changes the big one.</div> <div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Any thoughts?</div><div><br></div><div>Tim</div><div> Identi.ca / Twitter / IRC @timClicks</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>p.s. Apologies all for being silent for several weeks. I took a few weeks off during summer, then moved house (no Internet) & have been caught up with the Haiti earthquake response with the Sahana project.</div> </div>