Hi, I think an earlier code with revision no : 85 or 84 from our code repository(<a href="http://code.google.com/p/foodforce">http://code.google.com/p/foodforce</a>) has been packaged and made into FoodforceII activity and added as addon 4219. They have just changed the name from Foodforce2 to FoodforceII and also it is just a packaging of revision no 85. No value addition or anything in it... If they are claiming it is a fork of the project, why do i see no difference at all in this game version from the previous beta activity uploaded by us. As I understand, a fork means some development on the project which was different from the original project. I don't know why was it allowed to be uploaded as an activity on the activities page. What are sugar activity page moderators doing? This way, you can go, grab any cl of a codebase, and start packaging them as different activities and you will have dozens of versions of the same activity /Deepank <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Himanshu Hind <<a href="mailto:cooldude2064@gmail.com">cooldude2064@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi, I would like to bring to your kind attention, that there seems to be some discrepancy with the foodforce activity. There are two downloads available for the same activity on <a href="http://activities.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">activities.sugarlabs.org</a> page. One is addon 4206 and another is 4219. Right now I am running addon 4206 as it has more number of downloads and thus seems to be more stable. Still, it would be great if you could help new comers. thanks, himanshu _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a> </blockquote></div>