I forgot to say you something important: !!! thanks for your help!!! <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Dan Williams <<a href="mailto:dcbw@redhat.com">dcbw@redhat.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 09:39 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 21:07, Dan Williams <<a href="mailto:dcbw@redhat.com">dcbw@redhat.com</a>> wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 13:46 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 13:41, Daniel Castelo > >> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > >> > Sorry, just a distraction. > >> > Is the image that we use in Uruguay, and doesn't have the root access > >> > available. > >> > Network manager supports connections with a modem 3g? > >> > >> Current versions of NetworkManager do, but if it's the image now used > >> in Uruguay (based in Fedora 9), then it may be too old. > > > > What version of NM ships on those? NM 0.6x like we originally shipped > > in the images in 2007/2008? Or were Simon and Daniel able to update > > them to NM 0.7.x? > > This is F9 with NM 0.6.5-0.12.svn3246.olpc3 . I think NM 0.7 support > was added to Sugar 0.84 which hasn't gone into an official OLPC image > yet. </div>Ok, only NM 0.7.x and later support 3G. So it looks like they will have to wait for an official image, or install the NM 0.7.x ones by hand. Dan <div><div></div><div class="h5"> > Regards, > > Tomeu > > > Dan > > > >> I'm CC'ing Dan Williams who is the main author of NM in case he can > >> suggest you a way forward. > >> > >> Regards and good luck, > >> > >> Tomeu > >> > >> > Thanks for your help > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 13:22, Daniel Castelo > >> >> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > >> >> > OLPC release 9 (Joyride). is enough? > >> >> > >> >> Sorry, not sure to what image that may correspond. Can you tell me how > >> >> that image can be acquired? Depending on the configuration, root > >> >> access may be available or not. > >> >> > >> >> But James' suggestion is good, if you can do it via NetworkManager, > >> >> then you can work around the root limitation. > >> >> > >> >> Also, please don't drop the mailing list from the email recipients (do > >> >> "reply all" instead of just replying to me). > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> >> Tomeu > >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 13:01, Daniel Castelo > >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > >> >> >> > 0.82 of sugar with kernel 2.6.25-20090223.olpc > >> >> >> > >> >> >> A distribution is much more than sugar and a kernel, can you be more > >> >> >> specific? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Tomeu > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>> > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:50, Daniel Castelo > >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > First, I tried to sugarized gnome-ppp (made with C and gtk) and > >> >> >> >> > execute > >> >> >> >> > it > >> >> >> >> > as an activity. But it doesn't looks fine. Now i am thinking in > >> >> >> >> > rewrite > >> >> >> >> > gnome-ppp in python like "native" Activity. The problem that i > >> >> >> >> > have, > >> >> >> >> > is > >> >> >> >> > that > >> >> >> >> > I need to execute wvdial as root and write the resolv.conf file > >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> >> > dns > >> >> >> >> > configuration. How can I run things with root privileges? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Well, this has nothing to do with Sugar but with the underlying OS. > >> >> >> >> Which distribution are you using? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Regards, > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Tomeu > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Thanks. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso > >> >> >> >> > <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>> > >> >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:33, Daniel Castelo > >> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> > I am testing the client gnome-ppp to connect the Xo with a > >> >> >> >> >> > modem > >> >> >> >> >> > 3G. > >> >> >> >> >> > When I > >> >> >> >> >> > execute the client using consolehelper and pam (or the root > >> >> >> >> >> > user) > >> >> >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> >> >> > application looks without the sugar theme. When I execute the > >> >> >> >> >> > binary > >> >> >> >> >> > file of > >> >> >> >> >> > the client (/usr/sbin/gnome-ppp) it looks "fine". > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> And you want to create a Sugar activity with the functionality in > >> >> >> >> >> gnome-ppp ? Or what is the final goal? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Regards, > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Tomeu > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Tomeu Vizoso > >> >> >> >> >> > <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>> > >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:54, Daniel Castelo > >> >> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi. When I execute an application written in C and gtk with > >> >> >> >> >> >> > a > >> >> >> >> >> >> > "normal > >> >> >> >> >> >> > user" > >> >> >> >> >> >> > (not the root user) it looks fine, I mean sugarized (for > >> >> >> >> >> >> > example > >> >> >> >> >> >> > with > >> >> >> >> >> >> > rounded entry text). But if i execute it with the root user > >> >> >> >> >> >> > it > >> >> >> >> >> >> > looks > >> >> >> >> >> >> > without > >> >> >> >> >> >> > the sugar theme. On what it depends? > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> The Gtk+ theme is set per user, so if you run as root you are > >> >> >> >> >> >> running > >> >> >> >> >> >> it in a very different environment. If this is a problem for > >> >> >> >> >> >> you, > >> >> >> >> >> >> then > >> >> >> >> >> >> we may be able to help if you explain what you are trying to > >> >> >> >> >> >> do. > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Tomeu > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> >> >> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using > >> >> >> >> >> >> Sugar. > >> >> >> >> >> >> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - > >> >> >> >> >> >> David > >> >> >> >> >> >> Farning > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> >> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using > >> >> >> >> >> Sugar. > >> >> >> >> >> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David > >> >> >> >> >> Farning > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> >> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. > >> >> >> >> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David > >> >> >> >> Farning > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. > >> >> >> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David > >> >> >> Farning > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. > >> >> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David > >> >> Farning > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > </div></div></blockquote></div>