<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 09:19, Wade Brainerd <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wadetb@gmail.com" target="_blank">wadetb@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I have no experience with Launchpad, but am often frustrated by the<br> performance of SL Trac.<br> <br> At my office we switched from Trac to Redmine for internal project<br> development, since Trac's development seems to have slowed to a crawl.<br> <br> Provided a high priority is placed on migrating bug numbers and<br> keeping links to <a href="http://dev.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">dev.sugarlabs.org</a> working, I'm not opposed. I'll<br> probably take Gary's approach and let the dust settle though. Now<br> that 0.86 is out it's probably the best time to do this.<br></blockquote><div><br>I've just confirmed with our contacts at Canonical that bug aliases will be created for all the old bugs, of the form "sugarlabs-XXXX" or "sl-XXXX".<br> </div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Any chance OLPC would consider moving over too, so we could have true<br> connections between OLPC and SL bugs?</blockquote></div><br>I don't think it's been discussed, but I'll forward it to the OLPC VIG. It is certainly more likely if the Sugar Labs migration works well.<br clear="all"> <br>-- <br>Luke Faraone<br><a href="http://luke.faraone.cc" target="_blank">http://luke.faraone.cc</a><br>