Thanks for your help.<br>Regards<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 13:41, Daniel Castelo<br>
<div class="im"><<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="im">> Sorry, just a distraction.<br>
> Is the image that we use in Uruguay, and doesn't have the root access<br>
> available.<br>
> Network manager supports connections with a modem 3g?<br>
<br>
</div>Current versions of NetworkManager do, but if it's the image now used<br>
in Uruguay (based in Fedora 9), then it may be too old.<br>
<br>
I'm CC'ing Dan Williams who is the main author of NM in case he can<br>
suggest you a way forward.<br>
<br>
Regards and good luck,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Tomeu<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
> Thanks for your help<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 13:22, Daniel Castelo<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > OLPC release 9 (Joyride). is enough?<br>
>><br>
>> Sorry, not sure to what image that may correspond. Can you tell me how<br>
>> that image can be acquired? Depending on the configuration, root<br>
>> access may be available or not.<br>
>><br>
>> But James' suggestion is good, if you can do it via NetworkManager,<br>
>> then you can work around the root limitation.<br>
>><br>
>> Also, please don't drop the mailing list from the email recipients (do<br>
>> "reply all" instead of just replying to me).<br>
>><br>
>> Regards,<br>
>><br>
>> Tomeu<br>
>><br>
>> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>><br>
>> > wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 13:01, Daniel Castelo<br>
>> >> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> > 0.82 of sugar with kernel 2.6.25-20090223.olpc<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> A distribution is much more than sugar and a kernel, can you be more<br>
>> >> specific?<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Thanks,<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Tomeu<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>><br>
>> >> > wrote:<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:50, Daniel Castelo<br>
>> >> >> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> >> > First, I tried to sugarized gnome-ppp (made with C and gtk) and<br>
>> >> >> > execute<br>
>> >> >> > it<br>
>> >> >> > as an activity. But it doesn't looks fine. Now i am thinking in<br>
>> >> >> > rewrite<br>
>> >> >> > gnome-ppp in python like "native" Activity. The problem that i<br>
>> >> >> > have,<br>
>> >> >> > is<br>
>> >> >> > that<br>
>> >> >> > I need to execute wvdial as root and write the resolv.conf file<br>
>> >> >> > with<br>
>> >> >> > the<br>
>> >> >> > dns<br>
>> >> >> > configuration. How can I run things with root privileges?<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Well, this has nothing to do with Sugar but with the underlying OS.<br>
>> >> >> Which distribution are you using?<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Regards,<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> Tomeu<br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> > Thanks.<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso<br>
>> >> >> > <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>><br>
>> >> >> > wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:33, Daniel Castelo<br>
>> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >> > I am testing the client gnome-ppp to connect the Xo with a<br>
>> >> >> >> > modem<br>
>> >> >> >> > 3G.<br>
>> >> >> >> > When I<br>
>> >> >> >> > execute the client using consolehelper and pam (or the root<br>
>> >> >> >> > user)<br>
>> >> >> >> > the<br>
>> >> >> >> > application looks without the sugar theme. When I execute the<br>
>> >> >> >> > binary<br>
>> >> >> >> > file of<br>
>> >> >> >> > the client (/usr/sbin/gnome-ppp) it looks "fine".<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> And you want to create a Sugar activity with the functionality in<br>
>> >> >> >> gnome-ppp ? Or what is the final goal?<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> Regards,<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> Tomeu<br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> > Thanks<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Tomeu Vizoso<br>
>> >> >> >> > <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>><br>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:54, Daniel Castelo<br>
>> >> >> >> >> <<a href="mailto:dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com">dcastelo.sugarlabs@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > Hi. When I execute an application written in C and gtk with<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > a<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > "normal<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > user"<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > (not the root user) it looks fine, I mean sugarized (for<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > example<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > with<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > rounded entry text). But if i execute it with the root user<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > it<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > looks<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > without<br>
>> >> >> >> >> > the sugar theme. On what it depends?<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> The Gtk+ theme is set per user, so if you run as root you are<br>
>> >> >> >> >> running<br>
>> >> >> >> >> it in a very different environment. If this is a problem for<br>
>> >> >> >> >> you,<br>
>> >> >> >> >> then<br>
>> >> >> >> >> we may be able to help if you explain what you are trying to<br>
>> >> >> >> >> do.<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Regards,<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> Tomeu<br>
>> >> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> >> --<br>
>> >> >> >> >> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Sugar.<br>
>> >> >> >> >> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» -<br>
>> >> >> >> >> David<br>
>> >> >> >> >> Farning<br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >><br>
>> >> >> >> --<br>
>> >> >> >> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using<br>
>> >> >> >> Sugar.<br>
>> >> >> >> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David<br>
>> >> >> >> Farning<br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >> ><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >><br>
>> >> >> --<br>
>> >> >> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.<br>
>> >> >> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David<br>
>> >> >> Farning<br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >> ><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> >> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.<br>
>> >> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David<br>
>> >> Farning<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.<br>
>> What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David<br>
>> Farning<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>--<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.<br>
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David<br>
Farning<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>