I can't say I really agree, in my mind it looks pretty good (see पर्दाछवि.png).<div><br></div><div>One problem is that on stage 1 we're using more vertical space than we have when using browse w/ the toolbars (see पर्दाछवि_1_2_3_4.png), this is something that definitely needs attention.</div>
<div><br></div><div>However one really odd issue I kept running into while trying to take these screenshots is that at every pageload the icons seemed to randomely move about (see पर्दाछवि_1.png, पर्दाछवि_1_2.png and पर्दाछवि_1_2_3.png for what I mean). I don't remember seeing that behaviour before so I'm assuming the css is somehow messed up.</div>
<div><br></div><div>@Pavel: Do you think you could take a quick look at this issue? Thanks.</div><div><br>Christoph<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Roshan Karki <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:roshan@olenepal.org">roshan@olenepal.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">too small for the xo screen<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Bryan Berry wrote:<br>
> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 08:13 +0500, roshan karki wrote:<br>
>> It didn't looked ok.<br>
><br>
> u mean, it looked bad?<br>
><br>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Bryan Berry <<a href="mailto:bryan@olenepal.org">bryan@olenepal.org</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>> christoph, does 640px for the width of chakra look ok on the<br>
>> XO?<br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 00:42 +0545, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:<br>
>> > Roshan karki schrieb:<br>
>> > > > 2) Can you please make the thumbnails "2X2" instead of<br>
>> "1X4"<br>
>> > ><br>
>> > > @Roshan: I'm not sure what you mean by this... :-?<br>
>> > ><br>
>> > > I mean putting four thumnails in 2 rows and 2 columns like<br>
>> we had or as<br>
>> > > in your attachment.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Thanks, Bryan pointed that out to me in the afternoon,<br>
>> unfortunately I<br>
>> > haven't had the time to reimplement this yet.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > (@Pavel: Any advice or suggestions on how to achieve this<br>
>> cleanly are<br>
>> > very much welcome.)<br>
>> ><br>
>> > > Also I think we decided not to use combo-box. Correct me<br>
>> if I am mistaken.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Indeed, as mentioned in my previous e-mail drop-down menus<br>
>> are a no-go<br>
>> > hence my reimplementation is using tabs again.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Cheers,<br>
>> > Christoph<br>
>> ><br>
>> --<br>
>> Bryan W. Berry<br>
>> Technology Director<br>
>> OLE Nepal, <a href="http://www.olenepal.org" target="_blank">http://www.olenepal.org</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
<br>
</div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Christoph Derndorfer<br>co-editor, olpcnews<br>url: <a href="http://www.olpcnews.com">www.olpcnews.com</a><br>e-mail: <a href="mailto:christoph@olpcnews.com">christoph@olpcnews.com</a><br>
</div>