<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Martin Langhoff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:martin.langhoff@gmail.com">martin.langhoff@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im">On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Caroline<br> Meeks<<a href="mailto:caroline@solutiongrove.com">caroline@solutiongrove.com</a>> wrote:<br> > I worked with the RIT contingent and Dave Farning today to do some<br> > collaboration testing.<br> > We tested with 8 computers on a rarely used dev XS system hosted by Solution<br> > Grove.<br> <br> </div>Interesting!<br> <br> Your report is a bit confusing so I will<br> <br> - you had no problems connecting 8 users to a vanilla XS running some<br> 0.6d, right?<br> - but later on jabber.s.o you had problems with 29 users...<br> <br> Is that correct?<br> <br> What sw is jabber.s.o running? Does it deviate in any way from a<br> recent XS 0.6? Could network problems explain part of the problem?<br> </blockquote><div><br>jabber.sl.o is XS 0.5.2 stock install. It has 2GB of ram. Both xsdev and jabber.sl.o are virtual machines on the same network in the same rack. <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <br> What did ejabberdctl connected-users say at the points when users were<br> appearing/disappearing? Did ejabberd see them come and go? Or did it<br> think they were connected all the time?<br> </blockquote><div>connected-users reported the correct number, so when they were disconnecting and connectng, it was changing the reported number of connected-users. <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <br> These are very basic questions -- when doing this testing, you'll want<br> someone looking at the jabber server, dumping connected-users and<br> asking the Sugar users to run `olpc-xos` to compare.</blockquote><div> </div><div>We were using the Analyze activity to compare. On the 0.6 server it matched. I was watching the server and Analyze at te same time. <br></div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br> In fact a time-series of captures of `olpc-xos` on each Sugar / XO<br> client and `ejabberd connected-users` on the XS, plus a verbose log<br> from ejabberd would tell you a lot.<br> </blockquote><div><br>olpc-xos command is not installed on SoaS. Maybe we can add that. Using analyze we can see the real-time connection but I don't see any way to capture the data historically.<br> <br></div><div>Dave <br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br> cheers,<br> <br> <br> <br> m<br> --<br> <a href="mailto:martin.langhoff@gmail.com">martin.langhoff@gmail.com</a><br> <a href="mailto:martin@laptop.org">martin@laptop.org</a> -- School Server Architect<br> - ask interesting questions<br> - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first<br> - <a href="http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff" target="_blank">http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff</a><br> _______________________________________________<br> Sugar-devel mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br> </blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dave Bauer<br><a href="mailto:dave@solutiongrove.com">dave@solutiongrove.com</a><br><a href="http://www.solutiongrove.com">http://www.solutiongrove.com</a><br><br><br>