<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 17:55, Jim Simmons <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nicestep@gmail.com">nicestep@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div id=":31k" class="ii gt"> I've thrown together a few<br>
toolbars for Sugar Activities and it isn't that hard or even time<br>
consuming.<br>
</div></blockquote><div><br>Exactly. So why not leverage existing app development work in Qt *and* GTK-based products. Nobody's saying Qt is better, or takes less time. We're talking about enabling the porting of existing applications, which will take work, but much less work than rewriting an app in another toolkit or completely from scratch. <br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div id=":31k" class="ii gt"><br>
There were some emails in the past on how Tux Paint can't save to the<br>
Journal so you can't use it with Memorize, etc. </div></blockquote><div><br>Odd, it used to. <br><br>So, is the solution to fix the bug, or to rewrite Tux Paint?<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div id=":31k" class="ii gt">The GCompris chess
programs let you play with the computer but not with another child.</div></blockquote></div><br>Again, I don't see how it's easier to rewrite an app than it is to modify an existing codebase, such as adding on collaboration to GCompris. <br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Luke Faraone<br><a href="http://luke.faraone.cc">http://luke.faraone.cc</a><br>