Hi devendra<br><br>> I think it would be better we use some existing javascript<br> > libraries than to start from the scatch. so that we could get functon<br> > and classes to be used in every repetitive works.<br>I'm agree<br><br>> i know one interactive geometry . plotting and visualization<br> > library called JSXGraph but have not used it<br> > before. <a href="http://jsxgraph.uni-bayreuth.de/wp/" target="_blank">http://jsxgraph.uni-bayreuth.de/wp/</a><br>oooh, awesome!<br><br>There're some things about this library (and others) that are not linked with Karma dosing goals: they work in the global namespace and/or extending the native objects (array, function, etc) and they are not built as (jQuery) plugins.<div> <br></div><div>Karma is a jQuery plugin. I think if I need a function or method and it's relevant to karma plugin then I must add that to jquery.karma.js, so every relevant function / method / var will be available using $.karma[...]</div> <div><br></div><div><div><div>..one other way is to create Karma as a library without being a jQuery plugin (but using jQuery internally). This option is easier to develop than the plugin way, but we want to keep the eyes of jQuery community over karma. (philosophical -design discussion?) <br> <br><div class="gmail_quote"> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Bryan Berry <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bryan@olenepal.org" target="_blank">bryan@olenepal.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex"> added subzero on cc<br> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 09:42 +0545, devendra khadka wrote:<br> > I think it would be better we use some existing javascript<br> > libraries than to start from the scatch. so that we could get functon<br> > and classes to be used in every repetitive works. besides we may need<br> > some common classes which we need but are not available. so we should<br> > go on through and what to make.<br> > i know one interactive geometry . plotting and visualization<br> > library called JSXGraph but have not used it<br> > before. <a href="http://jsxgraph.uni-bayreuth.de/wp/" target="_blank">http://jsxgraph.uni-bayreuth.de/wp/</a><br> > i hope we could find more libraires for these.<br> ><br> > 2009/7/23 Bryan Berry <<a href="mailto:bryan@olenepal.org" target="_blank">bryan@olenepal.org</a>><br> <div><div></div><div>> -------- Forwarded Message --------<br> > From: Felipe López Toledo <<a href="mailto:zer.subzero@gmail.com" target="_blank">zer.subzero@gmail.com</a>><br> > To: Bryan Berry <<a href="mailto:bryan@olenepal.org" target="_blank">bryan@olenepal.org</a>>, Christoph Derndorfer<br> > <<a href="mailto:christoph.derndorfer@gmail.com" target="_blank">christoph.derndorfer@gmail.com</a>>, Sugar Devel<br> > <<a href="mailto:sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a>><br> > Subject: Karma: geometry functions<br> > Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:49:05 -0500<br> ><br> > Hi guys.<br> ><br> > I've been working on re-making some OLE Nepal lessons using<br> > javaScript,<br> > each time I found new things to do, most of them related to<br> > geometry.<br> > I think it's necessary to write some "geometry class" in order<br> > to<br> > expedite the activities development.<br> ><br> > currently supported:<br> > (draw) : rectangle, circle,<br> > (numeric): distance between 2 points<br> ><br> > working on:<br> > (draw) : polygon, ellipse<br> ><br> > could you suggest me some more functions?<br> ><br> > thanks in advance<br> ><br> > felipe<br> > --<br> > Bryan W. Berry<br> > Technology Director<br> > OLE Nepal, <a href="http://www.olenepal.org" target="_blank">http://www.olenepal.org</a><br> ><br> ><br> ><br> --<br> Bryan W. Berry<br> Technology Director<br> OLE Nepal, <a href="http://www.olenepal.org" target="_blank">http://www.olenepal.org</a><br> <br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br> </div></div></div>