<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Eben Eliason <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eben@laptop.org">eben@laptop.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I like these terms, but I don't think they define the split I'm<br>
referring to. object-push and object-pull describe, "sending an object<br>
to a friend" and "taking something from my friend's Journal"<br>
respectively. Both of these types of sharing are "object-sharing" (the<br>
recipient gets the resulting object, with a new tree_id).<br>
<br>
The more I think about it, I kind of like the "object-sharing" and<br>
"activity-sharing" distinction, since in all of our high-level<br>
outlines of Sugar we break the UI down into 3 core components: people,<br>
activities, and objects. In this paradigm, we have:<br>
<br>
object-sharing: the transfer of objects from people to people, via<br>
push (send to) or pull (view published journal)<br>
activity-sharing: collaboration among two or more people within an<br>
activity, acting on a shared object or objects<br>
<br>
Can someone phrase this more clearly?<br>
<br>
Eben<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Collaboration is the term we have used in Sugar for co-editing.<br>Google Documents use the term 'Collaborators'.<br>Isn't the verb 'Collaborate'?<br> --Fred<br>