<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:35, Bastien <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bastienguerry@googlemail.com">bastienguerry@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I'm a bit skeptical about using flossmanuals for co-writing and<br> translating Sugar's documentation.<br> <br> What are the real benefits over a simple wiki?</blockquote><div><br>Some points: <br></div><div><ul><li>It's what we use already. ("If it ain't broke, don't fix it")</li><li>It supports easy exporting to a variety of formats</li> <li>FLOSSManuals has infrastructure for print-on-demand dead-tree publishing</li><li>FM's software is explicitly designed for the task</li><li>FM supports easy remixing of content and creation of custom books pooling from a variety of on-site sources</li> <li>There is a community of tech writers who use it.<br></li></ul></div></div>More importantly, what are the benefits/reasons-in-favor of changing to a "simple wiki"?<br>-- <br>Luke Faraone<br><a href="http://luke.faraone.cc">http://luke.faraone.cc</a><br>