This is a great discussion. Thanks,<br><br>What are the next steps in figuring this out?<br><br>Is there something I can file a ticket on?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Bobby Powers <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bobbypowers@gmail.com">bobbypowers@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Amir Ansari<<a href="mailto:amir@open-edu.co.uk">amir@open-edu.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
> But the problem is that 'modeset' works with other machines and takes<br>
> advantage of a very useful kernel feature. Adding a blanket<br>
> 'nomodeset' removes this feature - it allows Mac booting, but to the<br>
> detriment of all other hardware.<br>
<br>
</div>I wouldn't say all other hardware. Intel graphics are the only one in<br>
mainline as of 2.6.30 that take advantage of modesetting, and<br>
hopefully Fedora's ATI modesetting will be accepted into the mainline<br>
for .31. At this point (things may be different in a year or two),<br>
kernel modesetting doesn't add much performance wise.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
bobby<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
> Ideally, there should be a way to detect whether it's needed and boot<br>
> accordingly. Hence the initrd notion (which would be complex, and I<br>
> don't know of it working on any other distro), or the simple addition<br>
> of a boot menu option.<br>
><br>
> I don't think it's a Fedora bug, this is something for the kernel<br>
> mailing list... ;-)<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 19 Jun 2009, at 01:32, Martin Dengler wrote:<br>
><br>
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 09:23:38AM -0400, Caroline Meeks wrote:<br>
>>> Is there a way we can modify SoaS so that mac users don't have to<br>
>>> [add "nomodeset" to the kernel command line] but it still works for<br>
>>> everyone?<br>
>><br>
>> Yes (SoaS could put nomodeset in its kernel command line).<br>
>><br>
>> Also you/we/"someone" should file a Fedora bug if there isn't one<br>
>> already.<br>
>><br>
>> Martin<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Caroline Meeks<br>Solution Grove<br>Caroline@SolutionGrove.com<br><br>617-500-3488 - Office<br>505-213-3268 - Fax<br>