<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Martin, I phrased that poorly.  A kid might care that James Simmons wrote Read Etexts.  He probably won't care if James Simmons is a part of Sugar Labs, or part of the community, or if it was part of GCompris, or if we consider Read Etexts part of Glucose, Sucrose, Fructose, etc. If a kid accidentally removes the Moon Activity and wants it back he might look in Math and Science or he might look in Pre-Installed.  It should be listed in both places. As far as Dominick's vs. Costco, I enjoy the time I spend at Costco and hate the time I spend at Dominick's.  A good taxonomy would encourage a kid to explore the site and see what's available.  A poor one would make him feel like I do on Sunday afternoons, wondering why canned tomatoes are in a totally different aisle than other canned vegetables, or why Pita bread isn't with the rest of the bread, or why Blue or Feta cheese isn't with the rest of the cheese in the Dairy section, etc. James Simmons Martin Dengler wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:20090610165525.GF10334@ops-13.xades.com" type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Other than that, does any kid or teacher care who maintains an Activity? </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> Clearly you view the answer as "no" (I think in general, the right answer is "not unless they can get something out of that person", which is a distinct possibility in FOSS-land, so actually I think the answer should be "they should because it can help them"). I don't know what point you're making, expect possibly "we needn't care about aslo's coherency for anyone other than 'learners'". </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>