With regards to the speed issue.<br><br>I tried SoaS on a USB2.0 (but not high-speed) memory-stick, performance was hideous on a macbook.<br>Using a USB2.0 high-speed memory-stick, performance is great on an eeepc, which has 1G Ram. I know its not small, but its all I have to compare with for now.<br> <br>So from what I have experienced the USB port would be the first target. I'll hopefully get a chance to test on low-RAM school computers tomorrow.<br><br>James.<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/6/8 Jonas Smedegaard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dr@jones.dk">dr@jones.dk</a>></span><br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br> Hash: RIPEMD160<br> <br> </div><div><div></div><div class="h5">On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 07:00:28PM -0400, Luke Faraone wrote:<br> >On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 18:43, Jonas Smedegaard <<a href="mailto:dr@jones.dk">dr@jones.dk</a>> wrote:<br> ><br> >> >It sound like another great, low impact (I am trying to think of a<br> >> >term like 'carbon foot print' to properly reflect the impact) way of<br> >> >bringing LTSP into the class room.<br> >><br> >> "polite" or "gentle" perhaps?<br> >><br> >> or "non-invasive"? Emphasizing what is avoided: invading -<br> >> potentially taking over, accidentally or on purpose, the computers<br> ><br> ><br> >Granted, you would *need* to check with your local systems<br> >administrator before implementing LTSP. (as opposed to a lower-risk<br> >USB-local-booting solution) At my school, for example, netbooting a<br> >workstation starts the "recloning" process of loading a new Windows XP<br> >image; setting up LTSP without asking would cause major problems with<br> >their work.<br> <br> </div></div>non-invasive to the _computers_ but invasive to the network<br> infrastructure.<br> <br> <br> So yes, a better term would be good, to not risk sysadmins feeling<br> cheated when learning the hard way that this so-called non-invasive<br> system includes a DHCP daemon, breaking their WiFi hotspots, printers<br> and what not.<br> <div class="im"><br> <br> - Jonas<br> <br> - --<br> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt<br> * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: <a href="http://dr.jones.dk/" target="_blank">http://dr.jones.dk/</a><br> <br> [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private<br> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)<br> <br> </div>iEYEAREDAAYFAkosXD0ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgTYwCeNg687lF4eEXrGw9SqB62AGih<br> 5WQAniL/ZEmBKsZ8zVMCRmPlNnScHmE5<br> =lu5m<br> <div><div></div><div class="h5">-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br> _______________________________________________<br> Sugar-devel mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br>