Lucian said: >However, I don't think it should matter too much which framework is >blessed I think the election of the js framework is an advantage for web devs, since one of the Karma objectives is to attract them. Bryan said: >it seems like a good route to >go would be to extend dojo or jQuery existing animation facilities >rather than creating a standalone animation library I'm agree, dojo or jQuery are the big contenders (the trends report support it), we can take their strengths in order to provide a more complete solution. I mean, web devs could use the js framework functionalities (i.e. widgets) that are no relatead with Karma extension. I have a little experience with dojo, but I'm looking about jQuery. Maybe we could provide some portability between them. I need to look the plug-in architecture. Anyway, I prefer on step at a time. regards. <div class="gmail_quote"> </div>