+1 activities I think it is easier to understand (we have enough jargon as it stands). We do need to take into consideration that not every language has "activities", some have "actividades" or "Aktivitäten" etc. Is this something that we can support through CNAMEs? The config file may have some odd things w/ this -- but we might be able to use super globals ($_SERVER) - or? Nothing should really be hard coded anyhow. Also, I have one other idea... how about someone asks a 6 yr old what they would expect it to be called. They should have 3 votes ;) - Mick   <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:48 PM, David Farning <<a href="mailto:dfarning@sugarlabs.org">dfarning@sugarlabs.org</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be. <a href="http://addons.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">addons.sugarlabs.org</a> or <a href="http://activities.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">activities.sugarlabs.org</a> Which do you prefer?  I like activities.sl.o better but it means more work for me to change it. So, for me, it is a wash. david (Contributors with marketing or brand development can have two votes) _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a> </blockquote></div>