Could the performance modifications be made into a runtime option, specified in a configuration file or command line option somehow?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:46 AM, victor <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Victor.Lazzarini@nuim.ie">Victor.Lazzarini@nuim.ie</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">> You mean olpcsound.spec in upstream CSound sources, or more (or<br>
> something else) than that?<br>
<br>
</div>No, I mean there is an scons option (something like buildOLPC=1). I have a<br>
spec of course, but that's for a fedora rpm.<br>
<br>
> You mean Felipe?<br>
<br>
yes, Felipe. And of course yourself, I was not aware you were doing<br>
this with him, thanks for the work.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> Still, the Debian packaging currently takes no special care for eventual<br>
> special Sugar needs. If olpcsound is only about leaving out CPU-heavy<br>
> stuff it should be a problem only for XO hardware (and similar low-end<br>
> hardware).<br>
<br>
</div>yes, that is why I am asking here what we should do. Originally, this<br>
whole thing was XO-only, but it seems to broadening now.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Victor<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>