+1<br>I am in too.<br><br>Arjun<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I believe this will make a very big difference in the future of Sugar.<br>
<br>
Good luck and have fun,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Tomeu<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 19:46, Wade Brainerd <<a href="mailto:wadetb@gmail.com">wadetb@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi all, hope you are enjoying FUDcon.<br>
><br>
> Given the recent events at OLPC, I'm planning to refocus my activity<br>
> development efforts on SugarLabs. I imagine other activity developers<br>
> are planning to do the same.<br>
><br>
> SugarLabs is off to a great start getting packages into distributions,<br>
> but I can't help noticing that the activities on the home page are<br>
> essentially the same were shipped with OLPC build 650 back in 2007.<br>
><br>
> One of the things that drew me to Sugar and OLPC was the promise of<br>
> high quality, collaborative, constructivist educational software.<br>
> While the initial activity set was good, it was also clear that there<br>
> were large holes to be filled. For a variety reasons, many of those<br>
> holes remain two years later.<br>
><br>
> And that's why I'm proposing the creation of a SugarLabs ActivityTeam.<br>
> The new team will be separate from the DevelopmentTeam, and will have<br>
> the responsibility of maintaining and extending the suite of<br>
> activities available for Sugar.<br>
><br>
> We will:<br>
> 1. Maintain and develop the current suite of Sugar activities.<br>
> 2. Recruit and mentor activity developers from the community.<br>
> 3. Collect, document and organize new activity and activity feature<br>
> ideas from the EducationTeam, deployments and community.<br>
> 4. Work with the DevelopmentTeam and the InfrastructureTeam to ensure<br>
> activity developers are well supported.<br>
> 5. Gather feedback with the DeploymentTeam about how Sugar activities<br>
> are doing in the field.<br>
><br>
> Until now, activity development has largely been an individual effort.<br>
> The purpose of this proposal is to collect the activity development<br>
> community into an effective team who can tackle the entire ecosystem<br>
> of Sugar activities together. One result should be fewer activities<br>
> "dropping off the radar" into lack of maintenance.<br>
><br>
> Please respond with your feedback about the proposal. If you like the<br>
> idea and would like to be part of the ATeam, feel free to indicate<br>
> that.<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
> Wade<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Arjun Sarwal<br><br>