i want to add something..<br><br>in the future we can work from <a href="http://activities.sugarlabs.org">activities.sugarlabs.org</a>, having all the general information for each activity there, like available localizations, hardware specifics (f.e this activity runs on th XO only) and then having links to the wikis there, for example in Sugar Labs wiki we could have, documentation of appilcations in the calssroom for each activity, with photos and videos, feddback from children and teachers,, etc.<br>
<br>just a thought.<br><br><br clear="all">Rafael Ortiz <br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 18:07, Gary C Martin <<a href="mailto:gary@garycmartin.com">gary@garycmartin.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 23 Dec 2008, at 12:37, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:<br>
><br>
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 13:32, Morgan Collett <<a href="mailto:morgan.collett@gmail.com">morgan.collett@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 14:25, Tomeu Vizoso <<a href="mailto:tomeu@sugarlabs.org">tomeu@sugarlabs.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 13:05, Gary C Martin <<a href="mailto:gary@garycmartin.com">gary@garycmartin.com</a>><br>
>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> I was just musing on building a wiki page to document the spin of<br>
>>>>> Labyrinth I'm hacking on, and I was about to create:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> <a href="http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Labyrinth" target="_blank">http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Labyrinth</a><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> So... Should Activity wiki pages be migrating over to SL<br>
>>>>> infrastructure?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Well, kids are right now getting their activities from the OLPC wiki.<br>
>>>> I think the plan of record is to set up a fork of <a href="http://addons.mozilla.org" target="_blank">addons.mozilla.org</a><br>
>>>> to replace the wiki-based system that is in use today.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> So if you want kids to get your activity today, I would keep using the<br>
>>>> workflow based on wiki.l.o, and later upload the bundle to<br>
>>>> <a href="http://addons.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">addons.sugarlabs.org</a>.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I think Gary's question was (and if not, certainly mine is): Where<br>
>>> should we be documenting, or project-managing, the activity<br>
>>> development? For example, <a href="http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Chat" target="_blank">http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Chat</a> - should this<br>
>>> migrate to <a href="http://sugarlabs.org/go/Chat" target="_blank">http://sugarlabs.org/go/Chat</a>?<br>
><br>
> My intent was to document the Labyrinth spin somewhere ~public so we at<br>
> least have some record should others want to go look or even provide<br>
> feedback, this could be either potential users or interested/curious devs.<br>
><br>
>>> I have every intention of continuing to upload the .xo files to<br>
>>> <a href="http://wiki.laptop.org" target="_blank">wiki.laptop.org</a>, so that they appear in [[Activities]] and<br>
>>> [[Activities/G1G1]] and [[Activities/All]] etc, as well as or until<br>
>>> <a href="http://addons.sugarlabs.org" target="_blank">addons.sugarlabs.org</a> is suitably working, but that doesn't provide<br>
>>> documentation, planning or descriptions of how to get involved in a<br>
>>> specific activity.<br>
>><br>
>> Oh, in that case it depends on who is your intended audience. If you<br>
>> want to address only to people involved in OLPC, then use the OLPC<br>
>> wiki, ml, trac, etc. If you want to address to all people involved in<br>
>> Sugar, then use the SL facilities.<br>
>><br>
>> Regards,<br>
>><br>
>> Tomeu<br>
><br>
><br>
> The <a href="http://wiki.laptop.org" target="_blank">wiki.laptop.org</a> text says that you should only add activities to the<br>
> official activity list pages (Activities/All is that space) if it's<br>
> considered "stable" (make up your own mind as to the quality of that<br>
> statement given some listed don't even launch), most activity authors seem<br>
> to usually start with an unlinked page for their activity during the<br>
> unstable phase.<br>
><br>
> Worth pointing out that there are quite a few such Activities off the radar.<br>
> For the curious the below link should show you all pages where at least the<br>
> author has used Category:Activities:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Category:Activities" target="_blank">http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Category:Activities</a><br>
><br>
> Anyway, this unlinked page aproach was the plan for the Labyrinth spin,<br>
> until it has had some time to mature or die if someone pushes for a better<br>
> solution. I'll just go ahead and build a w.l.o/go/Labyrinth page as it<br>
> doesn't sound like SL is quite ready for Activity wiki pages, and it'll be<br>
> easy to migrate content when that time arrives.<br>
<br>
</div></div>Got it. Makes sense to me.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Tomeu<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
Sugar-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org">Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>